Search for: "Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am by CMS
  On 5 and 6 October 2020, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in the matter of Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2173 This appeal concerns a collision at sea between the appellant’s vessel (“Ever Smart”) and the respondent’s vessel (“Alexandra 1”). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:24 am by James Scott
In March this year the Admiralty Court in London handed down its judgment in respect of a collision between “Alexandra 1” (“A1”) and “Ever Smart” (“ES”) (see: Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd [2017] EWHC 453 (Admlty)). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am by Joel Cockerell
Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd [2017] EWHC 453 (Admlty) that the crossing rule does not apply where one vessel is approaching a narrow channel intending to enter it and another vessel is navigating in the narrow channel intending to exit it, so as to involve risk of collision. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:34 am by Jonathan Lim, Resource Law LLC
The CA considered the principles applicable to interpreting the Colregs (as set out by the UK Supreme Court in Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited v Nautical Challenge Ltd [2021] UKSC 6) and held that Rule 9(a) of the Colregs embodies the Limit Requirement for the following reasons: a) The ordinary meaning of the wording in Rule 9(a) is different from the Old Rule 25(a) because: the scope of Rule 9(a) is not limited to just power-driven… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 8 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The appeal considered, first, whether Begum should be granted leave to enter the UK in order to pursue her appeal against the deprivation order. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 This appeal will consider issues surrounding liquidated damages and limitation of liability clauses. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester… [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal will consider whether a date should have been included or excluded for the purposes of limitation and, consequently, whether the Appellants’ claim against the Respondents is time-barred. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK)… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Kline School of Law, Taming Pharma with Benefit CorporationsDmitry Karshtedt, The George Washington University Law School, Regulating ‘Evergreening’: The FDA's Role in the Creation of Balanced Rights for Pharmaceutical ImprovementsMichael Sinha, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Legal Approaches to Ensuring Timely Generic Drug AvailabilityRebecca Wolitz, Stanford Law School, Patents, Preemption, and Price-Gouging Teaching Session 1G – Room… [read post]